Many organizations are laying more focus on social skills as compared to grades. I completely agree with the notion because possessing these is good for an organization as well as for an individual.
Having social talent allows a person to interact in a manner, which makes it result oriented, precise and to the point. An effective communication done by an employee while working for big clients, creates better experience and an efficient exchange of information between business and employer. This further enhances the relations of two, thereby promoting increased revenue, sales, trust and an everlasting value.
Secondly, implementing referred skills in a team, gives a positive environment to a job, marking a sharp boost in productivity and culture ethics. A recent survey by ABC revealed that, companies having more headcount of associates who are highly influential and convincing, grow at a faster rate than their peers in market. Furthermore, this ability of them makes them very bright prospect in plethora of roles like managing a huge project, leading the group, organizing cultural activities at corporate level, inspiring people to deliver excellent results and mentoring.
Finally, these applicants can always be a fair ambassador of their firm and may campaign for, when it comes to choosing by users because they possess inherent quality of expressing and justifying. Generally, friend circle is also big for them, playing a vital role in spreading brand awareness to the larger population. Technical candidature do not have these qualities, thereby resulting in stagnant growth.
In conclusion, companies are justified in their strategy of laying priority on social talent over academic or related field knowledge, as sales volumes are excellent which ought to be of utmost importance.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...liver excellent results and mentoring. Finally, these applicants can always be ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, while, as for, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1540.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96096199205 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692857142857 0.561755894193 123% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6463998896 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.333333333 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.75 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138762998289 0.244688304435 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0463871289303 0.084324248473 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0338975007095 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0702768329579 0.151304729494 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0289624114258 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.58950901804 128% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.