Some people argue that too much attention and too many resources are given to the protection of wild animals and birds. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, global warming is becoming a serious threat for all living creatures. Animals and birds are suffering severely, as compared to human beings. However, there is a mix opinion when it comes to utilising resources and using them to preserve wild life and birds, as few believe it is important and amount of resources used for it are good enough, while few believe, funds and resources are being over exaggerated. This essay will discuss importance of allocating funds for this cause.
Pollution, has become a major concern for all countries. Furthermore, on numerous occasions seminars have been conducted regarding creating awareness on how to maintain the balance. Natural habitat and wildlife has been at loss. In past, there have been a lot of instances where animals have died due to lack of resources and are not taken care of. Animals such as: pandas, Bengal tigers, polar bears, etc are sensitive. Therefore, it is important to take care of them appropriately. In order to keep them healthy, a lot of resources are required, due to this, resources are needed to be allocated accordingly.
While on the other hand, it is also important to utilise funds on other forums, such as: planting trees, maintaining natural habitat, in order make environment healthy and promote these things by corporate social responsibility. Also, it has been noted in past, countries that maintain balance between utilising resources smartly tend to contribute towards global environment, in a positive way. Nepal is a prime example of this and has been historically been only one country, that has contributed positively in terms of oxygen.
However, there are different ways, which could be used to take care of animals and birds. But, it is important to take care of them, as in past it has been noted, that different species of animals are now becoming extinct. Therefore,allocating funds for animal care is important ans should be maintained, before it gets too late.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 402, Rule ID: OVER_EXAGGERATED[1]
Message: Use simply 'exaggerated'.
Suggestion: exaggerated
... believe, funds and resources are being over exaggerated. This essay will discuss importance of ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'In the past'?
Suggestion: In the past
... habitat and wildlife has been at loss. In past, there have been a lot of instances whe...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 254, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...responsibility. Also, it has been noted in past, countries that maintain balance betwee...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 378, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
... contribute towards global environment, in a positive way. Nepal is a prime example of this and h...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 233, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , allocating
...mals are now becoming extinct. Therefore,allocating funds for animal care is important ans ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, therefore, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 28.0 13.1623246493 213% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 322.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13354037267 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23607819155 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8873187065 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 533.7 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6053010817 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2352941176 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9411764706 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41176470588 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0960095415809 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.029655396433 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329674303291 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0608988940826 0.151304729494 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308332167759 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.