Some people believe that after hundred years life will be easier for most of people, while the others are unsure. What is your opinion?
While some people believe that after a few centuries the life of people will have fewer struggles in comparison to this time, others argue that they are uncertain about the future. In my opinion, the growth in the fields of nanotechnology, and transportation is inevitable to make the life of people happy and comfortable over centuries.
To begin with, advancements in the field of nanotechnology will surely make the life of people more accessible, and comfortable in the coming years. This is because this technology in the future holds the possibility to cure any life-threatening disease, and thus, will increase the life expectancy, which in today’s world is not possible. Nano-techs are developing nano-robots which could be taken similarly as the tablets, and they are designed to travel with the blood in veins if they encounter any foreign body will initiate antigen, and an antibody reaction to curb the spread of disease. To illustrate, recently in a human trial nano-robots with a camera were given to the truck drivers to see how their metabolism works, while they are on the move, and the results were imminent. Therefore, an individual could be pre-diagnosed with the aid of this technology and thus, saving millions of dollars of people, and that could be diverted to other projects
Furthermore, there would be a drastic decline in the traveling time because of the advent of superfast trains, and personal planes (similar to cars). Thus, people would be able to travel hundreds of miles to and from work. Therefore, offering people the chance to pursue in their field of interest, while balancing between work-life. Consequently, people will be more content and happy with life, which is hard for the people of today’s era to achieve.
To conclude, I would like to say that with the current advancement speed in the technology, our future holds great endeavors in the field of nanotechnology, and traveling, and thereby, improving the lives of people of the earth.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 966, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...that could be diverted to other projects Furthermore, there would be a drastic de...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, similarly, so, therefore, thus, while, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 41.998997996 143% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1680.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 327.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1376146789 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97326036419 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529051987768 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 528.3 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 10.0 0.809619238477 1235% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.6203548992 49.4020404114 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 152.727272727 106.682146367 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7272727273 20.7667163134 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.90909090909 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265718608084 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105344837324 0.084324248473 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0702219644038 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158688826669 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0921822329282 0.056905535591 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 50.2224549098 84% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.