Some people believe that companies should hire only male staff.
Do you agree or disagree?
The selection of appropriate staff has always been a daunting task for the companies. It is often argued that organizations should recruit only male staff. I completely agree with this notion, not only because men have more time that can be devoted to the organization and travel a lot on a business trip, but also because they can overcome their emotional issues at the workplace. This essay will explore how these factors justify my opinion.
Firstly, the factor that compelled me to agree with the statement is that males can spare more time for the office. As the earning responsibility lies in males in contrast to females, who have to do the task of children’s upbringing at home, they can run extra miles in the office to do overtime which is beneficial for the company. Take an example of a company IBN Australia, which claims that half of the male staff do overtime at the office, which resulted in an increase in the company’s business to many-folds. Thus, appointing male staff beget a lot of benefits for the company.
Secondly, to expand business in the international market, the staff is required to attend meetings with the international delegates in other countries. Since males are not bound with their house-hold chores and family matters, they are able to travel for long distances. For instance, the Nestle company in Norway, asked their staff to pay visits to third-world countries, the majority of the females were reluctant to travel for a longer duration of time. Thus, the male staff is used as a tool to augment business in different nations.
Finally, women are more prone to psychological issues due to which they cannot concentrate at work. However, psychologists say that males have the potential to control stress-related emotions, and they can do the job more efficiently as compared to females.
To sum up, I completely agree with this statement. Not only because males have plenty of time to work, and can travel without worries, but also because of their psychological capabilities.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, third, thus, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06804733728 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91392934184 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523668639053 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3714727996 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.0625 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.125 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206441932456 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750607927087 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576545406196 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112584486816 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447512543344 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.