Few people assert that governments should bear the total expenditure for children who wish to pursue higher education in Institutions. I partially agree with this statement in context of giving away this scheme only to lower segments of society like those who are under a certain poverty line.
The most compelling reason for agreeing to this privilege is because there are many children world wide who belong to certain communities and tribes who are unable to get access to affluent institutions due to their background. For instance, countries like India which is densely populated and have divided themselves into various castes like scheduled caste and scheduled tribe and also disparities among people are quite evident and explicit. In order for such countries to progress, government needs to intervene in some situations to offer grants, bursaries or even at times scholarships to such students. This will not only aid in growth of the economy but also is a sign of a progressive country. Recent studies has shown that students from such atmosphere are more successful and have promising careers today in the field of engineering and medicine. Furthermore, they have truely surpassed expectations and have made their country proud. Therefore, its is largely a positive investment for government.
Opponents of this situation, believe that its an inappropriate expense on federal budget. As there are other pressing concerns to be tackled by the government increasing on an alarming rate. There is no denial of the fact that developing countries are relying on existing resources. Some are even oblivious of the fact that countries might be running on debts or low reserves. Due to scarcity of funds, people rightly advocate to divert any extra funds on building hospitals, improvising infrastructure and curbing air pollution. The real situation is unfathomable and thus might cause serious issues in near future. Hence, they are rightfully trying to alleviate such concerns.
In conclusion, while both views are commonly held in society, I believe that governments should lay out an annual budget for this group of students and carefully scrutinize whom they should give a grant, bursary or scholarship. Admittedly, there are other concerning issues but the budget should not move from one sector to another.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: worldwide
...lege is because there are many children world wide who belong to certain communities and t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: WORLD_WIDE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'worldwide'?
Suggestion: worldwide
...lege is because there are many children world wide who belong to certain communities and t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 91, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nappropriate expense on federal budget. As there are other pressing concerns to be...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, so, therefore, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1962.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 368.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33152173913 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87147910484 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619565217391 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 612.0 506.74238477 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5769277662 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.0 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221799425808 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0546583854931 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531009991684 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137616402677 0.151304729494 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605391713401 0.056905535591 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.