Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Knowledge is an essential weapon for all of us and we can not surpass difficulties without proper wisdom. It is believed by some people that it is a fare move if anyone shares expertise is the respect of scientific exploration for free while other group of thinkers supports that some crucial data should not be shared free of charge. Both has it own pros amd cons. Therefore, before commenting my view, both the views must be discussed.
According to some people, it is a benign decision if someone keen to spread knowledge about scientific research business without seeking any cost in return. The reason behind this is that one can resolve scientific problems without getting obstructed for financial support. For instance, there are many middle class Brilliant youngsters who cannot go forward only because of lack of funds and they are unable to study due to higher fees of institutions.
On the other hand, some argue that information regarding scientific analysis should not be given without charging fees because some informative data can be secret and valuable. If someone takes some money for giving assistance in this regard, it will give revenue to that person and his knowledge will be considered as well. For instance, many of the scientific scholars are earning smart money for livelihood and also getting fame in this field.
In my opinion, i firmly support the former view because one must be got some financial back in the lieu of one's hard earned pivotal wisdom regarding scientific research business and it should not be speard out for free
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 348, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'owns'?
Suggestion: owns
...t be shared free of charge. Both has it own pros amd cons. Therefore, before comme...
^^^
Line 1, column 377, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oth has it own pros amd cons. Therefore, before commenting my view, both the view...
^^
Line 5, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...iscussed. According to some people, it is a benign decision if someone keen ...
^^
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted for financial support. For instance, there are many middle class Brilliant yo...
^^
Line 9, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey for giving assistance in this regard, it will give revenue to that person and ...
^^
Line 9, column 341, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ill be considered as well. For instance, many of the scientific scholars are earn...
^^
Line 13, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... fame in this field. In my opinion, i firmly support the former view because...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, regarding, so, therefore, well, while, for instance, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01526717557 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59715927344 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599236641221 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2614707553 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.454545455 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.63636363636 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2527093876 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0906603996717 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082851364525 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153045415148 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0617556559668 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 50.2224549098 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 78.4519038076 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.