Some People Believe That It Is Good to Share as Much Information as Possible In scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Data accessibility often raises argument. Some people think that information in certain fields (scientific research, business and education) should be made easily approachable because this will augment development of these fields. Others believe that filtering of information is crucial because not every type of data is suitable to share free of cost. In my opinion, in order to maintain quality of information in these fields, there should be certain cost to it.
Advancement in business, academic and scientific fields requires critical analysis by the experts. If data of these sectors is not available to specialists, it will become impossible for them to analyse and devise improvements in it because restriction on its availability can be discouraging for them. Moreover, new comers in business market and students in universities would need existed information to conducted research further, and if they will have to pay hefty amount to access primary data in these fields, this might reduce level of their interest and scale of development.
However, others think, and to my mind, that applying restrictions on highly sensitive information is the primitive/primary rule to keep the quality of precious and valuable information intact. Many researchers spend their whole life in searching one particular theory, and it will be unfair to them if details of their research are accessible by just one click on the Google even though it would be advantageous for seekers. In addition, institutes and individuals must pay the levied amount to access pieces of valuable information so that the cost incurred while establishing a business policy, an academic research and scientific data could be recovered.
To conclude, division of data and information is necessary to establish worth of researchers and of data itself. Basic information should be easy to approach whereas, in my opinion, sensitive and costly information should not be provided without following standard procedure of its acquisition.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.51935483871 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09774850265 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554838709677 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.119000463 49.4020404114 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.583333333 106.682146367 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8333333333 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235905601896 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0901086783102 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576381418261 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148840322964 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572334310849 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.