Some People believe that it is good to share s much information as possible in scientific research, business and academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
According to a number of individuals, it is a noteworthy idea that all information should be available without any restriction, in institutions and organizations. However, other people think a level of restriction ought to be placed on specific facts. Ultimately, I consider that vital and crucial information needs to be handled with a level of confidentiality.
On the one hand, some people tend to think that every information should be accessed freely for some reasons. The most obvious one is for the purpose of research and development. It is more beneficial for researchers to have complete information on their work than to have incomplete data which will be more difficult to interpret. This is why many institutions now insist that all employees must have all their publications available in databases such as google scholar, researchgate and many others. In addition, the availability of existing records will make it easier for upcoming generations to solve problems. In other words, the resources of data will serve as leverage others can easily build on for the purpose of providing solutions.
On the other hand, some people have a strongly-held view that a number of information are too critical to be accessed by everyone and I agree. The most compelling reason being that the ownership of a brilliant work can be easily hijacked leaving the inventor unrewarded adequately. For instance, there have been reported cases of plagiarism of write-ups and ideas in the past, this could have led to the intellectual property been stolen if the issue was not reported on-time. Furthermore, restricting sensitive information can give a competitive edge. For instance, a company which keeps its future plan can easily win in the market.
In conclusion, while people may have a different view, I think that researchers, institutions and businesses who do not divulge all their facts to the public are ultimately rightly rewarded and they thrive better amidst competitors. Thus, sensitive materials are recommended to be handled with the required privacy.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 63, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[5]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun information seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much information', 'a good deal of information'.
Suggestion: much information; a good deal of information
...e people have a strongly-held view that a number of information are too critical to be accessed by ever...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, while, for instance, i think, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29787234043 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13745545337 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.553191489362 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8077490508 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.9375 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5625 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8125 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183034936361 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0645994966824 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.067960565817 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108358361472 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308642271474 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.