Some people believe that museums and historic sites should be open for free children under 18.
Do you agree or disagree?
Some people opine that places such as historical sites and museum galleries should not be charged for teenagers under 18. This essay agrees with this opinion because these places act as a source of knowledge for the young generation which must be given free of cost. Firstly, this essay will discuss how poor children will be benefited and secondly, it will outline the advantages in children’s education.
To begin with, it is evident that there has been a drastic decline in the number of visitors visiting the galleries and historic places. It is because of the higher entrance fees which cannot be afforded by the families of children below poverty. Therefore, allowing free entry for teenagers will attract them and compel their parents to visit those places. Consequently, parents would feel motivated and confident that their children will learn something without any cost. Recently in the year 2015, Singapore government has declared zero entry fees to historical museums and libraries for children below 18.
To elucidate it further, this proposal will help the youngsters to gain more knowledge about our history which would assist them in their academics. By providing free access to the exhibitions, children could evidence the unique objects collection used in the olden days and differentiate how it has been replaced over time with the improvements in technology. Every year as a part of academics, certain schools in India arrange a guided tour for primary and high school children to museums or historical places for practical learning of a subject.
To conclude, it is clear that the young generation will be highly benefited over free access to the galleries and historical sites. Overall, it not only helps the families of poor children to afford a visit but is also a source of education for every teenager. Therefore, government of every country should carry out this proposal for the upcoming talents of their nation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'objects'' or 'object's'?
Suggestion: objects'; object's
...ons, children could evidence the unique objects collection used in the olden days and d...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18670886076 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68021908565 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.534810126582 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 505.8 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.3150100816 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 117.071428571 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28747596739 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101324502881 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0982664563099 0.0667982634062 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179739556753 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0756739948336 0.056905535591 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.