Some people believe that not all criminals should be kept in prison but that some of them should be allowed to do unpaid work to help the community .do you agree or disagree?
It is thought by some that not every criminal should be sentenced to imprisonment for his wrong deeds but to work for the progress of the society at free of cost. I completely agree with the option of involving the guilty in constructive works as it will benefit not only the society but also for saving the State's valuable money.
A good reason to opt this approach is that not every culprit is destructive in his ways. By this I mean, majority of wrong-doers are not serious criminals, many of them are found guilty of small offences such as shoplifting, pickpocketing, law-breaking etcetera. For instance, in UK every year there are approximately 2000 cases of major and minor crimes. Moreover, it is not possible to put every culprit, even for a very small crime behind the bars and obviously, it will not be feasible to place serious criminals such as murderers, drug users, robbers, rapists along with shoplifters and thieves in the same cell as Small offenders may get intimation and guidelines to commit more serious crimes. Thus, the best way to use energy of such offenders constructively to get them involved in unpaid community work.
Another point to consider is that, preferring the prisoners for social work will ultimately help the nation to save financial resources. In other words, every government needs to hire a large proportion of workers for the development and advancement of society such as construction of roads, hospitals, building dams and maintaining drainage system etcetera. So indulging the guilty into this sort of work will eventually lead to benefit the society by saving huge amount of finance. Doing this means, the significant financial resources of the nation can be better used for other important areas such as healthcare system and education system etcetera. Thus, it is vital that state government passes a verdict referring to the involvement of selected sinners in the betterment of community and off course, free of cost.
In conclusion, minor offenders ought to be included in advancement works to raise the society and the state as it is the best practice to utilise human resources behind the bars. On top of it, their energy can be used positively to save State's valuable financial resources.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, thus, for instance, i mean, in conclusion, sort of, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1883.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04825737265 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84825767547 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528150134048 0.561755894193 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 591.3 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.5643655787 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.5 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6428571429 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158791595353 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0524307551042 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501675941172 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0983715008263 0.151304729494 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358858723055 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.