Nowadays, it is said that humans have vast myriads of food and cars to select from. Although, it is true living standard of society helps to narrow down the selections of food and cars. This essay argues that the monetary condition of a family has a direct effect on this topic.
The world is becoming smaller as tremendous options for food are available easily for every individual in any corner of the world. Many options of food have a distinct price range depending upon the quality of food as well as the place where people live; also, it has a straight relation with people’s earnings. For instance, if anyone wishes to have a meal in an expensive restaurant, then financial status must be higher than the average person has. I agree that it is totally true people have too many choices for food and cars it becomes simpler with a person’s income.
The Increasing level of luxury lifestyle has brought people more options for cars. It is to say that wealthy people buy luxury cars, and ordinary people buy standard cars. Although standard cars come with many ranges and varieties, the financial condition of an individual helps them to shorten the large list. For example, celebrities buy any car they want because financially they are more stable than a common man, even though there are so many luxury cars available in the market to choose from still it is pretty easy for them to buy any car they like regardless of the price of cars. I believe that it is extremely easy to select a favorite car out of many variables if people are wealthy.
Agglomerating all the matters from above, however, food and car selections have a wide range to buy from, the financial stability of people helps to narrow down the large list of food and cars to pick from.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...topic. The world is becoming smaller as tremendous options for food are availab...
^^
Line 5, column 206, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun range seems to be countable; consider using: 'many ranges'.
Suggestion: many ranges
... cars. Although standard cars come with many range and variety, the financial condition of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, still, well, for example, for instance, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1479.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75562700965 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39982560892 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546623794212 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 4.76152304609 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.0466409909 49.4020404114 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.25 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111726178506 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458610704066 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303661917275 0.0667982634062 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0704125213373 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0211024004268 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 50.2224549098 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.58950901804 96% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.