Some people believe that research into family history is useful for the next generations, while others claim that present and future are more important.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Genealogy seems to be a matter of attention for many people. While the study of one’s descent is deemed to be of high value by a generous number of individuals for the upcoming generation, a modest ratio has espoused this notion, believing that the limelight should be concentrated on the present and future.
Knowledge about the one’s family background has been momentous for people who are devoted to their forefathers’ culture and traditions. By being so meticulous of how they managed to deal with particular issues in their lifespan, as this group opine, similar cases are more conveniently confronted with. Japanese genealogists, as a prime illustration, are of the view that if they extract more information about their ancestors, not only are they better informed about some hereditary diseases like pernicious kinds of cancers, for instance, but also lessons they acquire from their descendants shed light on their attitudes in their current life. No wonder, then, their children have more salient comprehension of their future path.
Despite the significance of one’s thorough know-how about their past generation aforementioned, some skeptical opponents of this notion opine that the more they focus in their current affairs and have in-depth implemented strategy to their lives, the more thriving their achievements would be. Being adapted to their country’s existing culture and way of thinking, Europeans, in the same breadth, try not to just obtain information about how their descendants lived, but take quick-witted approach to fulfill their objectives. Had they not mindfully investigated the dire consequences of World War II in their society, German people, however, would not have a booming economy the second only to the USA now.
To recapitulate, although the present life and an appropriately planned future path is of high priority for the next generation, I, firmly hold that the results are more staggering when they are provided with their family background and received authentic information on their ancestors’ thought-provoking approaches toward particular issues.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, second, so, then, while, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58950617284 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15646897221 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601851851852 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 20.2975951904 158% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 95.845761513 49.4020404114 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 181.1 106.682146367 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.4 20.7667163134 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0993340502344 0.244688304435 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0477901958484 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0328316905911 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0747319242525 0.151304729494 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302204510443 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.1 13.0946893788 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.54 50.2224549098 61% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.0 11.3001002004 150% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.54 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.1190380762 146% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.