Employers sometimes ask people applying for jobs for personal information, such as their hobbies and interests, and whether they are married or single. Some people say that this information may be relevant and useful. Others disagree.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Additional information about personal lives of whom seeking for a job vacancy, seems to be important for their prospective employers. While sharing particular information including areas of interest and marital status is deemed to be functional by a myriad number of people, it is refuted by some, regarding them irrelevant.
Obtaining specific personal information about a job applicant who is going to be recruited, on the one hand, is a quick-witted approach for better comprehension of their area of interest. In this way, not only does the confidential know-how of employees assist their managers how to incentivize, but also is valuable for fitting them into extracurricular after-work activities. Google, the world-famous american corporation, as a salient instance, pays a close attention on its likely employees, exploring for detailed information about their leisure time preferable hobbies in human resources’ recruitment interviews. No wonder, then, why its staff are satisfied with their job and try their best to be as collaborative as possible during their attendance at work.
Opponents of sharing extra personal information, nonetheless, presume it inappropriate to be asked with job seekers, believing that they may misconstrue their employers. If the perspicacity of such information in not properly justified, as they opine, it culminates in bemusement about their personality for their employers, consequently. Had she not been questioned for beloved pastime group activities, my wife as a software engineer, however, would not have enjoyable regular gatherings with her photographer co-workers now.
To recapitulate, pursuing for personal information such as areas of interest which plays a pivotal role in an employee’s intrigue to be well-integrated with the company, is truly compatible with my belief, albeit doubtfulness of some individuals of the veracity of such information should not be unnoticed.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, however, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, then, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1659.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76041666667 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.46799742976 2.80592935109 124% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638888888889 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.7056464899 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 165.9 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.8 20.7667163134 139% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.7 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.293778923899 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123216256556 0.084324248473 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058908477393 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183094608675 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0171766826492 0.056905535591 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 13.0946893788 153% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 26.14 50.2224549098 52% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 11.3001002004 147% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.72 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.84 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.7795591182 158% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.