some people believe that students work better if the teacher is strict, others think it is better for students if the teacher has a friendly approach.
discuss both views and give your opinion
The sole job and duty of a kid is to get educated which plays a pivotal role later in his life. While some believe teachers should be strict, others think children work better if the teacher has a friendly approach. I stand with the first group due to several reasons which will be discussed in the following.
To begin with, it has been proven that jobs get done at best quality if the doer has a strict approach, and thus does teaching. In other words, the greatest results will be obtained if the worker acts strictly. For instance, it is believed that army is the most successful organization in every country and it can be said that undoubtedly the most ruthless work culture can be found in army.
Moreover, there is a risk that students take advantage of a friendly teacher. It is believed that the main issue with new generation’s upbringing is that they do not know any limit, and thus acting friendly, like their parents, will result in rebellious students who nor study neither listen in the class. Listening to teachers’ complaints about these days learners will proof this matter.
Last but not least, the crucial task of kids is study which eventually makes a foundation on which their future and career is built. Although it may seem harsh, tuition with a strict approach guarantees good results. While in behaving friendly there is a big risk that pupils do not pursue their lessons well enough. From my point of view, in such an important matter these kind of risks should not be allowed.
Consequently, I believe schools should have a strict approach toward students based on what was said before. What matters the most is the results which should be awesome, not the way they are achieved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 218, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...trict approach guarantees good results. While in behaving friendly there is a big ris...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 369, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...nt of view, in such an important matter these kind of risks should not be allowed. Cons...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for instance, kind of, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1432.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78929765886 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55908578099 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612040133779 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.6688524003 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.4666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252444243846 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836891090745 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121595797717 0.0667982634062 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130582954386 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0777408306008 0.056905535591 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 50.2224549098 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 11.3001002004 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 12.4159519038 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.