Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
It is a fact that we do not recycle all the domestic waste and some would suggest that the only way to achieve maximum recycling of household waste is by framing legal regulations and enforcing them. I would not agree to this notion and believe that there are other ways to encourage people to recycle and to reuse more.
In my view, a new recycling law would be just one of the possible ways to tackle the waste problem. Governments could make it a legal obligation for householders to separate all their waste into different bins. There could be punishments ranging from small fine to community service, and even perhaps, imprisonment for repeat offenders. These measures would act as a deterrent and encourage citizens to obey the law and take necessary steps to recycle more of their rubbish. As a result of improved behavior of home owners, the surroundings will be hygienic and waste-free.
However, government should take certain measures to educate their public rather than merely passing a law. It might be more effective if governments could organize public workshops or recycling campaigns. People will be more interested to participate in such campaigns as they would be curious to understand the benefits of recycling. In addition to that, educational institutions could also contribute by teaching their students the positive effects of waste recycling. Apart from this, authorities may also reward public, who are contributing for this initiative religiously.
To summarize, passing a law to promote recycling may help to some extent, whereas, educating people will result in more effective results.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 93, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... help to some extent, whereas, educating people will result in more effective res...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, whereas, apart from, in addition, as a result, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22988505747 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87270996272 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.3773257479 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331289902684 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111906840695 0.084324248473 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0591713221904 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205856145532 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0435576621303 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.