Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. they sat that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement. To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?
Most of the times household debris is not recycled and is thrown away. So, many people think that it should be the government who must enforce a law on the public for reutilization of the materials that can be recycled. I also think that there should be such a law as it is beneficial for individuals as well as for the country.
Firstly, usually people do not obey laws, if any action is not taken on their negligence, but they strictly follow the rules and regulations, violation of which leads to severe punishment or penalties. For example, if traffic rules do not abide by individuals, then they have to face action against them. Consequently, they never try to break the law. Therefore, enacting a law for reprocessing of garbage will force people to sort out the thrown away waste ultimately recycling of some useable products.
Secondly, reprocessing helps in building a country’s economy as it leads to the manufacturing of materials that are of incredible benefit to the nation. Recently, students from the University of Karachi who work on waste reproduction, have claimed that if they are given a chance they can generate electricity from the litter. Pakistan has been already scarce in electricity production, hence if this goal is accomplished this would be a remarkable outcome of recycling waste.
On the contrary, before imposing a law for recirculation of garbage, the government should run an awareness campaign about the importance of this issue either by advertisements or organizing seminars in different parts of the country. Moreover, children in school must be taught the principle of reuse, reduce and recycle. As a result, they will act upon it in their homes also thus, will also compel their elders to follow this rule.
In conclusion, enacting law is necessary to make people stick to the process of recycling, as it is of great advantage to the countrymen as well as the nation itself. But some knowledge should be provided by the authorities so people can act upon the law, lest they do not get punished without any awareness.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, well, as for, for example, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1741.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 347.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01729106628 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31600926901 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95528890775 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547550432277 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 547.2 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9953701471 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.066666667 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1333333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.6 7.06120827912 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.281243634554 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.084098727439 0.084324248473 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0483757704778 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145578066369 0.151304729494 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0483514858752 0.056905535591 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.