some people say that in all levels of education, from primary to universities, too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.
do you agree or disagree?
It is thought that more time is dedicated to theoretical work as compared to practical work in all educational levels either it's elementary, secondary, graduation or post-graduation. I also agree with this statement due to some practices which are followed conventionally in almost all educational institutions.
To start with, the main site of focus at every level is theory. This is because learning facts rather than applying them practically helps both teachers and students to cover syllabus thoroughly and quickly. For example, at school, we were taught many chemical reactions that we were keen to perform and asked our teachers for practicing them in the lab but they denied due to lack of time. Moreover, some practicals are considered to be more money consuming. For instance, at the graduate level, we had to study the technique of electron microscopy but were unable to perform it practically as an electron microscope is such an expensive instrument that only a few labs can afford to buy it.
On the other hand, some people also disagree with the opinion because some institutes are there whose ground focus of learning is practical. As they can afford costly experimental equipment. To exemplify, some schools like Beacon house are there who give priority to practical learning and able to afford these expenses to educate their students. Furthermore, research institutes where post-graduation studies are conducted such as ICCBS, the entire course is dependent on the practical application of the learned techniques, it is there people argue that much of the time is utilized in learning through practicals.
In conclusion, I believe that the major part of the students’ entire education is based on learning theoretically. However, there are exceptional cases where people can claim contrary to this view.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... ground focus of learning is practical. As they can afford costly experimental equ...
^^
Line 7, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arning theoretically. However, there are exceptional cases where people can claim...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, moreover, second, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1548.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31958762887 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04691453679 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601374570447 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 492.3 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3010090874 49.4020404114 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.076923077 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3846153846 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9230769231 7.06120827912 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248203702711 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.082288446608 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0532601386298 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140456926501 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616876720651 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.