Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their wast

Essay topics:

Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled. They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement.

To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Domestic refuse and garbage seems to be a major concern for municipal governments as few people care about recycling wastes. While making it a legal requirement for people to reuse certain kinds of wastes can be an important step, it will not achieve the intended results if the government doesn't establish recycle centres for bringing those wastes into use again.

To begin with, many people are wasteful and throw away things which are still serviceable. it is for those people the litigation against disposing wastes might seem to be effective because they will be forced to find a wiser choice than throwing them off altogether. Moreover, there are certain items such as plastic hand bags which should be banned completely and if people are found littering these non-degradable products, they should be held responsible by institutionalizing mechanisms of fine. This practice has forced citizens to resort to reuse of the paper products in some developed countries such as France.

However, the government is also responsible for providing centres that deal with wastes to make the legal arrangements work effectively. Therefore, government can set up compost centres and provide incentives for people to collect their bio-degradable garbage separately and not mix with plastic materials. In addition, collection systems should be provided for people to dispose different categories of their wastes at a convenient distance from their homes and it should be the role of the government to recycle them. However, if such mechanisms are not complied with and people do not cooperate with the government to help recycle things, there should be clear penal provisions.

In conclusion, enacting laws can demotivate people from throwing away domestic wastes haphazardly and carelessly. However, institutional arrangements and incentives to comply to them also need to be provided for the effective enforcement.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... the intended results if the government doesnt establish recycle centres for bringing ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...way things which are still serviceable. it is for those people the litigation agai...
^^
Line 9, column 148, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rrangements work effectively. Therefore, government can set up compost centres an...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, as for, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1626.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47474747475 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98371596556 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56228956229 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9393817125 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 106.682146367 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 20.7667163134 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.66666666667 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299104969578 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119743309068 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625236014047 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192865738336 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0619936871965 0.056905535591 109% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.