Some people feel that paparazzi should not follow celebrities and invade their privacy by taking pictures of them everywhere, while others believe this is just the price of fame.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
The world has become a global village and privacy is now considered as an obsolete term. There is a group of people who assert the fact that paparazzi should not follow famous people rigorously, whereas, another group is of the view that celebrities don't have a private life and it is the price of their fame. I shall be elaborating both perspectives in detail before reaching a final verdict.
To begin with, celebrities have made a conscious decision to make their life public by opting media industry. it is quite obvious that fans are eager to know more about their favorite personality life and look forward to their pictures and latest activities. These days many celebrities are paid to post their routine pictures on social mediums. Paparrazi’s are just doing their job by sharing famous people routine life schedule with the fan base.
On the other hand, many times pararrazi goes to the extreme and invade celebrities privacy to an unethical extent. celebrities are a normal human being and should be given the liberty to live freely without being judged by the cameras all the time. paparazzi take pictures and build an artificial story out of the image; the poor celebrity does not even know that they are being bashed by their fans for a sin they did not commit. For instance, many celebrities are scandalized with co-workers irrationally whereas in reality they are just posing for a simple picture or standing together for their movie/drama promotion.
To recapitulate the aforementioned, In my opinion, paparazzi should work within their professional limits and should realize those famous people sometimes also require their private space. In order to make a fancy storyline, they should not be making false news which can be turned into a character assassination of a particular person.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 251, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...r group is of the view that celebrities dont have a private life and it is the price...
^^^^
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...r life public by opting media industry. it is quite obvious that fans are eager to...
^^
Line 9, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Celebrities
...brities privacy to an unethical extent. celebrities are a normal human being and should be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 250, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Paparazzi
...ing judged by the cameras all the time. paparazzi take pictures and build an artificial s...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, whereas, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1526.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10367892977 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76893588981 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595317725753 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 496.8 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.491820628 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.384615385 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92307692308 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233151778045 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787617539479 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463755709746 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135161637064 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282583750206 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.63 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.