Some people feel that paparazzi should not follow celebrities and invade their privacy by taking pictures of them everywhere, while others believe this is just the price of fame.
Discuss both sides and give your opinion. Give reasons for your answer, and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
There is no deny that people in movies, serials get most amount of attention from news media. Photographers in general tend to force their way in private life's of celebrities. Some folks argue that this comes as part and parcel of stardom. In this essay, we will both side and put forward my view why I believe that paparazzi should give some space to any individual.
Some people would not have any objection about invasion of privacy by media persons. This kind of behavior will have many negative impacts. For instance, recently a south korean pop-star was abducted from her house because a news reporter followed her back to her house. The security and well-being of such stars is at huge risk concomitant of proliferation in news houses. So, no matter what life of person is precedented before any glamor.
I believe every human being has their own personal space. This space should not be intruded, having such freedom is paramount right of all persons even if they are celebrities. Camera-man and video-graphers should not force themselves upon the well known personalities. Nowadays, there are airport-looks, gym-workout look, movie-promotion, award cermonies and myriad of ocassions where celebrities need to appear and due to social media they even have lesser privacy than ever before. Hence, I believe since we already have so many mediums of access to any person, paparazzi should reduce barging inside life's of any person and give them their space.
In conclusion, media houses should not intrude in private space of celebrities. Instead, there should be healthy set of boundaries between media and famous personalities. Because I agree to notion that everone is entilted to their personal freedom of space and well-being.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, look, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, in general, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16901408451 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80268419248 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616197183099 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.7462539855 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3529411765 106.682146367 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7058823529 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.41176470588 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167302682252 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0506562925924 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501070326088 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102413335613 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538322988271 0.056905535591 95% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.