Some people feel that public money should not be spent on cultural amenities such as museums, theatres and art festivals. How important do you think these things are to society as a whole? Are there any areas which are more important for the government to fund?
Public art and cultural events play a significant role in a society’s life as they make human beings experience impressive emotions and create strong bonds between different sectors of society. However, it seems to me that funding these activities by government should be questioned because a range of other sectors is much more important for investments.
Admittedly, it is correct that every municipality should have facilities which would be the centers of creativity, culture and art innovations. While the most of people deal with high levels of stress during workdays, festivals and theatres are the places, where individuals experience an atmosphere of relaxation, entertainment, genuine emotions and cultural impressions. This lessens anxiety caused by stressful environment at work and socializes human beings. Thus, it is logical to conclude that spending public money on cultural amenities seems highly likely, nevertheless, I tend to suggest other options that are much more valuable for society and should be funded.
First of all, it is of paramount importance that the first aim of public money investitions should be education and tuition costs subsidizing. Supporters of this highlight the fact that educated individual has no intention, for example, to make crimes in order to earn money for living and has considerable employment opportunities in the modern world. Thus, investments in education contribute to solving key social problems ranged from high crime rates to unemployment. Another area to consider is sustainable lifestyle projects. Environmental pollution is the gravest issue nowadays, and the long term consequent problems of this may include climate change, depopulation, deforestation and rapidly decreasing of biodiversity. All this significantly endangers the human race being, and, therefore, governments of all countries should financially support initiatives that turn our lifestyles to sustainable ways.
Overall, the art and cultural places are certainly a priority to some extent for funding. However, it should be seen as one among a range of issues to be solved, and investments in education and environment protecting should be much more important.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt role in a society's life as they make human beings experience impressive ...
^^
Line 3, column 155, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the people') or simply say ''most people''.
Suggestion: most of the people; most people
... culture and art innovations. While the most of people deal with high levels of stress during ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 579, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ities seems highly likely, nevertheless, I tend to suggest other options that are...
^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
... of public money investitions should be education and tuition costs subsidizing. Supporte...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 480, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igh crime rates to unemployment. Another area to consider is sustainable lifestyl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, while, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1881.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18819130857 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621212121212 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.123928051 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.357142857 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5714285714 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92857142857 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276902721686 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0858979876896 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656562622661 0.0667982634062 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168998919109 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039020943572 0.056905535591 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 78.4519038076 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.