Some countries today have passed laws against smoking tobacco in public buildings such as offices and restaurants. Other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate, and reach your own conclusion on which side you favour
In today’s world, the most of the countries, especially in the western world, lead prohibitive policy regarding to smoking cigarettes in public areas while others have no regulations about this. I am going to consider both sides of the discussion in this essay.
The major factor why smoking in public places is prohibited is that tobacco smoke brings negative consequences to individual’s health. And if smoker’s desire to consume tobacco is completely voluntary, then other people around him or her in public have no intention to inhale potentially harmful smoke. Another point to consider is that the habit of smoking can be treated as bad habit, therefore doing this publicly may instill this habit to easily inspired people like adolescents or women. This should be avoided. Finally, tobacco appears to be considered as drug because it causes addiction to it and wide range of illnesses, from heartache to cancer. While almost all countries have laws against drug consumption, tobacco smoking should be prohibited on par with other drugs.
However, opponents of this approach claim that the lack of laws against tobacco may bring some merits to a state. To exemplify that, people that smoking tobacco freely and publicly do not pursue the goal to control their habit or reduce tobacco consumption. Because cigarettes are additionally taxed, country’s economy may be significantly driven by wide tobacco consumption. In addition, sometimes it seems to be impossible to pass laws against smoking due to political landscape. For example, strong lobby of tobacco production companies in government can hinder initiatives of public smoking ban.
In conclusion, I would tend to side with the supporters of smoking regulation. It seems to be that benefits of this approach outweigh it possible disadvantages. I hope governments all over the world will put conscious efforts to take care of public health.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nces to individual's health. And if smoker's desire to consume tobacco ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, however, if, may, regarding, so, still, then, therefore, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38283828383 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00146464046 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590759075908 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.4050514441 49.4020404114 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.9375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9375 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.353651747978 0.244688304435 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111277491981 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517079069507 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20740776532 0.151304729494 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650914988673 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.