The best way to educate children is by using the Internet in every lesson. To what extent do you share this opinion? What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children?
Due to the advent of the Internet, education protocols tend to be changed, and many suggest that the Internet should be considered to use in classes in order to improve pupils’ performance. It seems to me that this idea will bring huge benefits in the educational process, nevertheless, other steps of improving effectiveness of teaching will be considered in this essay.
The major factor why I agree with the internet using is that it can provide attracting and inspiring opportunities to learn a particular branch due to the scope of a content which the Internet stores. While there is universal consensus that one of the key issues with which almost every teacher counteracts is the lack of interest of students, the Internet can help teacher to successfully improve pupils’ involvement in the educational process and encourage them for acquiring knowledge. To illustrate that, there are several YouTube channels which make various interesting experiments related to physics in order to clearly explain underlying physical principles. Moreover, these shows are made in an attractive and readable manner, and, thus, a possible viewer will never get bored. In addition, the setting of these experimentations appears to be impossible to recreate in the class environment, so, in this case the Internet is the only one source to explain some physical processes visually.
Another point to consider is that World Wide Web may improve a teacher’s performance in the class. For instance, if a lecturer experiences the lack of information or knowledge to support his point of view or theory, it seems reasonable to appeal for support to the Internet. Although, it may be true that the authority of the teacher can be decreased due to this, but this approach appears to be outweighed by the merits of improvement performance.
Turning to possible alternatives, it seems reasonable to suggest at least two measures. First of all, an orientation on practical facets of studying should be considered, meaning that process of school should concentrate on solving or suggesting a solution for some issues presented in a real world. This turns student’s knowledge from only theoretical training to some practical skills needed to thrive in the modern world. Secondly, an increased scope of team working should be also suggested. Teamwork positively affects cognitive skills of human beings and socializes individuals.
In conclusion, it seems to be proven that the Internet can maximize the opportunities of acquiring knowledge while solving-oriented approach as well as team working are other ways to make education more effective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 752, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tractive and readable manner, and, thus, a possible viewer will never get bored. ...
^^
Line 3, column 1006, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...plain some physical processes visually. Another point to consider is that World ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, at least, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 41.998997996 155% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2243.0 1615.20841683 139% => OK
No of words: 416.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39182692308 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16665652897 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 698.4 506.74238477 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.8018909185 49.4020404114 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.1875 106.682146367 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126761655388 0.244688304435 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0400025045605 0.084324248473 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038779203306 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0812723385145 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040192941443 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.56 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.