Everybody should donate a fixed amount of their income to support charity.
How far do you share this viewpoint?
In today’s world, charity organizations contribute considerably to solve many daunting issues related to education, poverty, water and food provision, and environment protection. While they are funded through voluntary donations made by many people around the world, it seems to me that the idea of obligatory donations of a part of income brings more disadvantages than benefits, and I will explain why in this essay.
Perhaps the main factor here is that a lot of people in the world have income below a poverty line, therefore, donating a particular amount of money for charity may aggravate poorness of their monetary status. This should be avoided. Another point to consider is that it appears to be discriminatory to specify how human beings should spend their money. It does not matter they were born in wealth or work to earn it, people have absolutely right to independently decide how to manage their incomes, Finally, donations for charity support are suggested as voluntary action. If head of households is induced to withdraw some amount of money on regular basis, even for benevolent intentions, it can be considered as paying bills or taxes. Thus, it has no common with the roots of charity.
While it might be correct that obligatory donations incite huge investments towards on charity organizations that significantly increases effectiveness of these organizations. Despite this, the sense of obligation completely nullifies a value of this gesture.
Overall, the approach of compulsory donations compromate these investments because of its obligation and discrimination. Charity should be supported by free will of donators, not by forcing them to do it.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...does not matter they were born in wealth or work to earn it, people have absolute...
^^
Line 3, column 635, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ds is induced to withdraw some amount of money on regular basis, even for benevol...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...o common with the roots of charity. While it might be correct that obligatory don...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 152, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at significantly increases effectiveness of these organizations. Despite this, th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, may, so, therefore, thus, while, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37735849057 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08623882104 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637735849057 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.039115862 49.4020404114 136% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.83333333333 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223845501026 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079074788992 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446163090011 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116596465862 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0498671101928 0.056905535591 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.