Environmental pollution is a serious issue and it is important to take steps on an
individual level to reduce it. But now, since it is becoming an international issue, it
is time to take environmental protection to a higher level. To what extent do you
agree or disagree?
During much of the twentieth century, little action was taken to encourage lifestyle
changes that are environmentally sound. However, over the last twenty years,
significant efforts have been made to educate humanity about the threats modern
lifestyles pose to the environment. It is agreed that environmental protection efforts
need to be brought to the fore of global priorities and taken to a more advanced
level of activity. Manners in which this can be done will be analyzed, namely through
the global employment of renewable energy and through global educational efforts.
Firstly, renewable energy needs to be developed further to really make a difference
in mankind’s fight against global pollution. Take solar power, for example. At the
moment, solar power is still notably more expensive than petrol, although the gap is
closing quickly. With a little extra push, solar power could become a cheaper energy
source, thus inciting pollution-causing petroleum industries to shift their focus to the
renewable energy sector. It is for this reason that environmental protection should
be taken to a higher level.
Secondly, a big part of the fight against pollution is educating people about the
measures they can take to help. For instance, advertizing on highly frequented
websites like Facebook could do a lot to raise awareness of the lifestyle people need
to employ to best help the environment. Because online efforts to promote
environmental awareness are low at the moment, it is felt increasing them could
encourage people to be receptive to new lifestyle changes. It is for this reason that
the idea of beefing up the world’s environmental protection efforts is supported.
After analyzing how growth in renewable energy and awareness can help the current
global environmental crisis, it is felt the argument for environmental policy
improvements has been proven. It is recommended these policies be put into action
the world over.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, still, thus, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.53745928339 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02264334643 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563517915309 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5611447661 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.333333333 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46666666667 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 24.0 4.38176352705 548% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151942881376 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584118410514 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523085290889 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0462684761918 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050816372913 0.056905535591 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.