In a world where scientific and technological advances dominate, people working in the arts are considered, having significant impacts on many persons. The essay will discuss my viewpoints and trends of individuals more interested in art or technology than.
There are many factors, which appear in my brain about the consideration. First of all, Youngers are biased by artists from their internet accounts when technology and science are rapidly developed. Taking idols in k-pop, who are the current object on mass media, as a prime example, Netizens publicize them; accordingly, fans are impacted by their fashion trend and many sold-out items. Furthermore, many famous icon brands will invite idols to purpose advertisement and ambassadors through social media in the high tech age. In addition, people working in art and scientific advancements still need to support each other; in other words, if artists want to create a new product, they will be forcedto spend a long time and be fixed by high-tech apps. In contrast, when the technology and science field debuts a new item, they will need to use artists' popularities to promote this product's recognition.
In my opinion, almost everyone in the world will choose the tech and science field instead of the arts. First, humans' life condition will be improved by high-tech items like domestic robots, computers, and smartphones; indeed, no one can sustain when high-tech products disappear in the current age of scientific advancements, and their lives will become chaotic. Next, technology makes it easy for people to find suitable jobs; moreover, their income increases and the immigration of innercity rate declines.
In conclusion, I think that artists and technological fields support development together; furthermore, the standard of living also rises higher than it depends on technology and science.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 215, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e are rapidly developed. Taking idols in k-pop, who are the current object on mas...
^^
Line 2, column 884, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'products'' or 'product's'?
Suggestion: products'; product's
...se artists popularities to promote this products recognition. In my opinion, almost ev...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...to promote this products recognition. In my opinion, almost everyone in the worl...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, i think, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, first of all, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39726027397 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89901659904 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.626712328767 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9942126346 49.4020404114 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.333333333 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.5 7.06120827912 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195386844835 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0747938492963 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05258645105 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134766138666 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0367105483194 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.