Some people say that in all levels of education from primary schools to universities too much time is spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills. Do you agree or disagree?
According to a section of the society, the education system focuses more on theoritical facts in comparison to the practical lessons. I agree with the statement as most of the students fail to perform well at a job after undergoing an entire course for the same subject.
The primary reason for lack of focus on practical skills contributes to low weightage of such skills during evaluation in examinations. The curriculam in all the universities or boards has been divided in such a way that practical exams only comprise of 25% of the total marks for a subject. this leads to more focus on the areas which help an individual score better marks. Moreover, teachers are also concerned about getting a good overall result instead of aiming for more understanding on a subject. Consequently, students give less importance to laboratory sessions.
Another reason which leads to low practical knowledge is the absence of equipments and electronic devices in the laboratories. The instruments used to conduct experiments are generally expensive and universities avoid investing an exorbitant amount of money. In addition to this, authorities prefer avoiding an mishappenings which could occur due to mishandling of chemicals in the researches. These should ideally be handled by proper training from the teachers. This approach has created a negative influence on the overall learning of the students.
In conclusion, the school authorities and teachers should focus on creating a better understanding in the students by conducting and demonstrating experiments themselves. Regular audits from the government can help in monitoring the situation of the educational institutions.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 242, Rule ID: COMPRISE_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprise' or 'consist of'?
Suggestion: comprise; consist of
...in such a way that practical exams only comprise of 25% of the total marks for a subject. t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 292, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...f 25% of the total marks for a subject. this leads to more focus on the areas which ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...on to this, authorities prefer avoiding an mishappenings which could occur due to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, moreover, so, well, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46538461538 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20673062507 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4175868839 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5714285714 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07142857143 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117234526025 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363820185766 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.03098568531 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0669766860739 0.151304729494 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00737241221285 0.056905535591 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 78.4519038076 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.