Some people say that the current obsession with technology and the internet means that we are creating a generation of people that have poor social skills. Do you agree with this statement?
Some believe that increased interest in technology and the internet has taken a dramatic inclination for a decade. people are now more addicted to the use of mobile phones, personal computers, electronic gadgets that support connectivity. Maybe this is making a generation one should not anticipate, making them a poor social animal and constraining them to these electronics and the internet. I completely agree with the above-mentioned statement because due to this niggas are going crazy and habituated the behaviour which has a dangerous future.
To begin with, when it comes to using mobile phones in every country more than 95% of people have a cell with them to communicate with others and not to mention about their internet usage which is unbelievable. Earlier back in 20th century there is no internet or developed electronics, where communication was interactive and with mutual meetings. but, with the advent of wireless communications, no person is willing to meet or greet someone outside. For example, A study has revealed that people who often use gadgets are increasing rapidly since the past 5 years due to affordability of both internet and devices through which people can surf the content they desire.
Furthermore, when technology and the internet are combined that makes a combination which lures the people's attention and makes them obsessed towards it. Many companies are easily grown with the use of cloud computing and developing programmes that could serve the purpose they intend due to this people are attracted and its hard for them to come out this obsession. For instance, a survey conducted on a group of people has reported that people who often encounter daily with technology and internet are found to be psychologically stressed than the people who do not know what these are.
In conclusion, if we use the technology in a limit we can make wonders but over usage also has reminiscent effects which are irreversible and can put us in detrimental dangers. I personally use the internet to talk with people but in a limit.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: People
...en a dramatic inclination for a decade. people are now more addicted to the use of mob...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 551, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...behaviour which has a dangerous future. To begin with, when it comes to using mo...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 350, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...s interactive and with mutual meetings. but, with the advent of wireless communicat...
^^^
Line 9, column 101, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...hat makes a combination which lures the peoples attention and makes them obsessed towar...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 293, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ld serve the purpose they intend due to this people are attracted and its hard for t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, may, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12684365782 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92913967022 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572271386431 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 563.4 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.284484614 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.692307692 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0769230769 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.360198953264 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124462268348 0.084324248473 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0576002957117 0.0667982634062 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214742176712 0.151304729494 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386131990656 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.