Some people say it is important to keep your home and your workplace tidy, with everything organised and in the correct place.
What is your opinion in this?
Over the years, the importance of organising things has increased around the globe. Due to this, several people anticipate that it is crucial for an individual to arrange the objects properly at home or at offices. What are the positives of being neat and tidy? A thorough scrutiny of the above will lead to an insightful response.
While it is convenient to adopt one side over the other, I prefer to present a balanced ergo objective assessment. In my opinion, being well-organised is definitely vital for day to day life. However, it is not compulsory to become successful in your future. The subsequent two paragraphs will detail both the aspects extensively.
The first and foremost, the simple habit of organising objects could give you a great benefit in life. Planning things in advance and executing it in a particular manner is pivotal in today’s competitive world. In support of the above, it is observed by scientists that the organised person could do assigned activities faster than others and considered of an above-average intelligence.
In contrast, not able to arrange things at home or workplace never hampers the ability of people to be successful in their life. Furthermore, an enough intelligence to execute allocated tasks in a stipulated time with an appropriate outcome is adequate than messed up surroundings. For instance, we never heard of cleanliness quality of the Albert Einestein, though he is one of the greatest scientists in the world.
Keeping all of the above-mentioned facts in mind, organised mindset and making use of it for the future are obvious components of our reality. In contrast, factor such as intellectual capability is well worthy of equivalent consideration. To conclude, as is most of the things in our life, there are two sides to the matter. Fortunately, in this case, both of them are constructive.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 363, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'above-average intelligence'.
Suggestion: above-average intelligence
...es faster than others and considered of an above-average intelligence. In contrast, not able to arrange th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 143, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'enough intelligence'.
Suggestion: enough intelligence
... successful in their life. Furthermore, an enough intelligence to execute allocated tasks in a stipula...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 9, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...est scientists in the world. Keeping all of the above-mentioned facts in mind, organise...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, so, well, while, for instance, in contrast, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1569.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14426229508 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14031616167 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593442622951 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1075947606 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.1666666667 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9444444444 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.06120827912 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142050625184 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0369690746268 0.084324248473 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0392406891413 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0675543121998 0.151304729494 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272127851752 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.