Some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go the cinema. Others say that to be fully enjoyed, films need to be seen in a cinema.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Technologies changed the way of living life. At present time, mobile phones are become assential part of human being. A group of people are in favour of watching the movies on electronic gadgets, whereas others refuting it and have counter thoughts that cinema is the only source to provide pure entertainment toward films.
Discussing the foremost view, the strongest agrument is, watching a movie at home is cost effective. To justify, internet facility is now available with affordable price. So, enjoying the movie on mobile or tablest is being crucial part for the middle class family. Moreover, the time flexibility is oneof the focal point in favour of accessing the media on electronic devices. For Instance, people who can not spend three hours of leisure time for movie, can enjoy movie on mobile based on their sloting time conveniency.
Others have diffrent perceptions, the foremost one is, facilities of cinema provides pure entertainment. A huge sound proof hall, high qulaity sound, big screen these are the key features in inclination toward the multiplex. One can fulfill the purpose of exact entertainment to relax from stressful life. Furthermore, the real fill of the story can only be received by big screen movie. For example, the action movie have many scenes of car racing or gun firing which are full of sound is not effective when it seen in the mobile.
In conclusion, I believe that cinema is one of the greatest options of entertainment which provides huge picture in proper enviroment. However the media provided on latest mobile application is also one of the affordable option for the people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he foremost view, the strongest agrument is, watching a movie at home is cost ef...
^^
Line 3, column 58, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...remost view, the strongest agrument is, watching a movie at home is cost effecti...
^^
Line 3, column 226, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the movie on mobile or tablest is being crucial part for the middle class family...
^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d three hours of leisure time for movie, can enjoy movie on mobile based on their...
^^
Line 5, column 192, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...big screen these are the key features in inclination toward the multiplex. One ca...
^^
Line 7, column 136, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ides huge picture in proper enviroment. However the media provided on latest mobile app...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 24.0651302605 29% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1367.0 1615.20841683 85% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10074626866 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72232372191 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600746268657 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.8380173312 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.1333333333 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111719367317 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0347849090722 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249712409221 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0634869719077 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210325174263 0.056905535591 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.