Nowadays, a conflict has been observed among university students when it comes to choose subjects based on one’s choice or subjects based on more future prospects. Though it is advisable to allow students to choose subjects on their own but I strongly support that they should be only allowed to choose subjects based on their future scope.
A student should always have a freedom of selecting subjects which they like. A learner will invest more time and energy on a subject that is attracting one’s passion. This will result in something more fruitful and appreciable. It is found that there have been suicidal tendencies among students when they study subjects that are imposed on them and not chosen. Students feel demotivated which results in depression and wrong thoughts of failure. So, it is recommended to allow a student in university to study subjects based on their choice.
Though a student can be given entire freedom of choosing subject on their own, I strongly agree that university should take the responsibility of allowing students only select those subjects that have scopes in the future. Being an educational institution, it is their’s responsibility to shape the future of their students. Spending time on subjects that have relatively less importance in the future is useless and a waste of time. For example, special classes have been started in most of the universities to guide them which field has better future aspects and students should choose subjects based on such. I believe that changing is the only constant. It keeps oneself upgraded with future subjects which is the perfect step to survive in the future.
Selecting subjects in university is always stressful. Though it might help one to choose subjects based on choice but selecting subjects that will be of value in future can also be opted for. To conclude, I feel choosing subjects based on future scopes is the most preferred option than selecting the subjects on their own.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'freedom'.
Suggestion: freedom
... scope. A student should always have a freedom of selecting subjects which they like. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, for example, i feel
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1667.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 326.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11349693252 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24917287072 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69689825363 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.447852760736 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.4752166269 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0588235294 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1764705882 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 7.06120827912 28% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29637046107 0.244688304435 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111158620367 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0718747444419 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.201442225613 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448917943121 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.