Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like.
Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
whether or not universities should allow the selection of subjects based on the preference is becoming highly controversial topic. While some people believe that students must have power to select subjects based on their interests, others think that subjects in the educational institutions must be taught based on its relevance in future. This essay will discuss how students future can be made safe by teaching subjects important for future but learning by interest is more superior than the latter one.
On one hand, there are various compelling reasons which suggests that subjects should be decided based on usefulness. Firstly, it can bridge the gap between the industry and universities. Secondly, It will lead to better future by ensuring that student must have skills which is required by the companies. For example, a recent study in India reveals that students who are graduating in science and technology have better chances for getting the job. Therefore, it can be concluded that students can ensure the better and prosperous future by studying subjects which are in demand.
On other hand, there are counterarguments which are in favor of selection of subjects bases on interest. Learning by interest is more interesting and can brought the hidden talent of person to outer world. A professor at university of London says that most of the inventions which are happening in the modern era by the people who choose their stream by interest. Hence, a person can show its talent if he is allowed to make selection based on its interest.
Should students be allowed to make selection based on interest ? This essay discussed why selection for courses can help in building better future but one can expand to unlimited horizons by learning through interest. In my opinion, despite of the fact we can ensure the safe future by selecting the subjects based on relevance, one can reach the heights if he is allowed to follow his interest.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whether
whether or not universities should allow the se...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
whether or not universities should allow the se...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHETHER[7]
Message: Perhaps you can shorten this phrase to just 'whether'. It is correct though if you mean 'regardless of whether'.
Suggestion: whether
whether or not universities should allow the selection...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...s must be taught based on its relevance in future. This essay will discuss how students f...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 472, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[2]
Message: The adjective more is normally used with to and does not need 'more' (so called implicit comparative). Probably you need to write: 'superior to'.
Suggestion: superior to
... for future but learning by interest is more superior than the latter one. On one hand, there a...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08411214953 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70707001713 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.495327102804 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 511.2 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5155668385 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.8 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181440586789 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0744195212338 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620316411547 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124320146188 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699932927018 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.