Some people think that the best way to improve road transport safety is to let the driver test each year. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Opinions are divided on whether enforcing it to retake driver tests every year is the best approach to improve road transport safety. I disagree with this viewpoint and I believe that there are other effective ways to ensure safety on roads.
Although it is a widely held belief that road accidents could be reduced significantly by mandatory driving tests every year or so, in practice, this is not a cost-effective way. Evidence for this can be seen in the fact that conducting and undertaking such tests would put a financial strain on the government as well as on drivers. This is because the government would have to spend taxpayers money unnecessarily to provide more driving test facilities and more staff to assess one's driving skills rather than spending it on healthcare and education. The same applies to members of the public who could not afford to retake their test and perhaps would not want to squander their savings on paying test fees every year.
In fact, instead of obligatory driving tests annually to ensure road vehicle safety, the better alternative might be to impose strict traffic rules and to improve road conditions. With regard to the former, traffic police should fine heavily those who violate the traffic guidelines. By doing so, people would obey the rules and would pay close attention to road signs and traffic signals. Constructing wide roads and filling potholes would be another way to ensure safety on roads because most accidents happen due to poor road conditions. Not only would this increase road safety, but also reduce congestion, especially during rush hours and chances of accidents would be less likely.
In conclusion, I disagree with the idea that retaking the driving test every year is the best way to improve transport road safety. On the contrary, I believe that enforcing traffic laws and improving road infrastructure would be a more effective solution for this problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 481, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...est facilities and more staff to assess ones driving skills rather than spending it ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, in conclusion, in fact, as well as, on the contrary, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 319.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07836990596 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63126886305 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532915360502 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 499.5 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.0059166128 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.615384615 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5384615385 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.07692307692 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23561710014 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101422138584 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862940291193 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187832057925 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763079545759 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.34 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.