Some people think that certain prisoners should be made to do unpaid community work instead of being put behind bars.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is a controversial issue that if criminals ought to be put to do free community work or simply be thrown to prisons. Although making potential prisoners give back to their societies by doing some useful jobs seems beneficial for both parties involved, it raises some serious concerns such as whether it is safe enough to let them roam around the city.
On the one hand, allowing some certain prisoner to participate in some community projects helps them to gain sense of accomplishment and improve their confidence. In addition, it can be educational since they can acquire some hand on practices which they might take a liking to choose to pursue them as their profession after they served their time. Furthermore, the new work force can make a huge impact on government budget in two ways. Firstly, fewer prison facilities would be needed as fewer number of people spend their time there. Therefore, some of the complexes can be sold or turn to other uses. Secondly, more work can be done with less amount of money paid for each project. Hence, this new development seems like a win-win situation for both sides.
On the other hand, people who have been sentenced to prison cannot be trusted. No one can guarantee their honest cooperation. They might take advantage of the change and flee or worst hurt other staff at their job. In addition, if the unpaid job option becomes mandatory instead of an alternative, it can be viewed as a form of slavery since people would be forced to work for free. Regardless of the committed crime, no one should be condemned to such fate.
In conclusion, I do believe in all the benefits that this program can bring to the society since as discussed above it can be both educational and money-saving. However, to make it a success, one should pay close attention to who get into the program and prepare the environment beforehand. Finally, the option should be proposed to potential candidates as on alternative and not an obligation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 356, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nough to let them roam around the city. On the one hand, allowing some certain p...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 550, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ople spend their time there. Therefore, some of the complexes can be sold or turn to other ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s on alternative and not an obligation.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1652.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 340.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85882352941 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29407602571 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70674378871 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576470588235 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2191624427 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1764705882 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.52941176471 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269021205138 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881783050119 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0689717939749 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172156713376 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0406904891606 0.056905535591 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 12.4159519038 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.