Some people think that computers and the internet are more important for a child's education than going to school. But others believe that schools and teachers are essential for children to learn effectively. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is true that the computer and the internet are enjoying an upsurge in their usage in almost all the realms of life, and the field of education is no exception and their usage is widespread in almost all the educational institutions around the world. However, in my opinion, academic advisors and teachers are the most effective and efficient means of learning and are indispensable, as they provide individual assessments and support.
The Computer and the web, on the one hand, have been universally acknowledged as an extremely helpful tool for improving the education sector and to better share knowledge freely and seamlessly. The internet, firstly, provides a gateway for accessing infinite information on click of a button. As a result, students can learn their subjects easily by sitting at home, without having to visit the schools. Secondly, latest technological inventions such as Skype allow students to take online classes from tutors located at a completely different part of the globe, this, provides flexibility and an opportunity for the younger generation to learn in a distant manner.
Teachers, on the other hand, are one of the most important factors behind ingraining best of the academic knowledge to the students. They have had an enormously positive influence on students and are much more efficient when it comes to teaching. The major differentiating aspect of learning from instructors is that they provide an emotional and motivational support to a student, which I believe, is must in today’s competitive environment. Furthermore, teachers are experts in evaluating the performance of the students through various assessments ensuring they acquire knowledge which is genuine and of a high standard. On the contrary, computers are just a man-made machine which is not as intelligent as humans and cannot foster children with emotional support. The information on the web, more importantly, is not always consistent, and more often than not, the study material available on the internet is not from genuine sources leading in learning incorrect concepts and facts.
From the above argument, it can be concluded that it is undeniable fact that the high-tech tools such as computers, web, and smartphones have a plethora of benefits in the upbringing of a child. However, they can only act as an additional source of acquiring knowledge, and cannot be a primary source of learning. Whereas, in my opinion, teachers were, are and will always be the most ideal way of learning.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 414, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ', the latest'.
Suggestion: , the latest
...ut having to visit the schools. Secondly, latest technological inventions such as Skype ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a distant manner" with adverb for "distant"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ity for the younger generation to learn in a distant manner. Teachers, on the other hand, are on...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, whereas, such as, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2118.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 402.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26865671642 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02478151857 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524875621891 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 665.1 506.74238477 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.1419064602 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.2 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7333333333 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155084705804 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0487974734498 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272960794061 0.0667982634062 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0862780697006 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0303220673735 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.52 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 78.4519038076 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.