Some people think the government should be responsible for solving the pollution problems which results from heavy traffic.To what extent do you agree?
In today's world, Everyone is suffering from excessive pollution problems with the increase of transportation. Some people assert that pollution problems can be evacuated by authorities actions which is caused by mammoth traffic. I agree with this aforementioned notion and this essay will discuss why i am agreed to this statement.
The first and the foremost, Old vehicles which are almost in defunct condition used gigantic manner on roads due to lack of strong law to control them. This vehicles keep on producing detrimental pollution and severe effects to all living beings. This condition is happened because government is fully failed to restrict and demolished those vehicles when it is necessary. Due to improper control on this deteriorated vehicles, government is responsible for this gloomy situation of toxic pollution.
Secondly, Lack of infrastructure which is a momentous factor in dwindling the pollution problem caused by traffic is also a paramount point to make authorities responsible for solving it. With the surge in blossoming technology and high living standards, government employees had not paid attention to increasing population required amenities. For instance, In the peak hours, metropolitan cities of India is totally jammed due to scarce means of infrastructure. Less infrastructure which result in high traffic will always cause pollution problems.
To recapitulate the above mentioned reasons, this essay discussed government failure in controlling over used vehicles and developing transportation concrete for its citizens. Therefore, I agree with the notion of government responsibility of solving the problem.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 302, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... notion and this essay will discuss why i am agreed to this statement. The fir...
^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: These
... to lack of strong law to control them. This vehicles keep on producing detrimental ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1412.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 246.0 315.596192385 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73983739837 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21487923201 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2866116894 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.615384615 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9230769231 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.46153846154 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270253894869 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0997414808928 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0817880076977 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164223375633 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535292731805 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 12.4159519038 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.92 8.58950901804 115% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.