Some people believe that taxing companies, which cause it, is the best way to reduce industrial pollution while some suggest that there are several other ways to solve this trouble. Discuss both the views and give your opinion.
In our newfangled society, With the proliferation of human's living standard, a profound propulsion is also seen in hazardous pollutants brought by the unrelenting nature of technology. In this regard, some pupils surmise imposing mammoth taxes on the companies who are responsible for pollution is the exemplary way to alleviate this menace. However, others contends' there are plenty of different ways to solve this deteriorated conditions. I moderately accede with former notion, but I believe there must be some other way also to dwindle this problem.
First of all, Authorities should make gigantic tax slab for industries, factories and companies which are owned by private business men, entrepreneur and so on to cushion the unhealthy gases. The primary reason for this viewpoint is to decrease the emission of industrial waste by controlling the unwanted debris which is not demanded. Another cause for concern is the climate change effected by this detrimental litters. To illustrate, After GST in India, there is a huge decrement in industrial waste on quarterly basis shown by a report. With scarce means of profit warned by undemanded products and amenities, companies may restrict themselves to affect the atmosphere.
Contrastively, By blossoming strict norms other than taxation and other safety procedures, it is virtually possible to stop contaminated waste and pollution evacuated by factories and industries. Nowadays, companies do not consider or take care of safety methods to control the eviction of pollution and litters released in lakes and sea. After applying secured way to production and several government norms industries are trying their best to control the detrimental pollutants in America. Constructive norms and precautions may help defaulters to release the waste in sparsely manner.
To recapitulate, this essay discussed both sides of view with my perception. Therefore, I do surmise other ways than taxation are more instrumental than former thoughts.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, therefore, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1693.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55081967213 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04943415125 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609836065574 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 532.8 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.7814769431 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.866666667 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272518694794 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0823013183371 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667849065039 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149352501173 0.151304729494 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0651498005335 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.