Some people think that the government is wasting money on the arts
and that this money could be better spent elsewhere.
To what extent do you agree with this view?
It is assumed that spending money on arts and art forms is worthless by some people around the nations and they feel that same could be spent well on other things like development or aesthetics of the city.let’s peep into this and have a look about what is beneficial for the people.
To embark on, government is the accountable source when it comes to spending money on things that embellishes the city or state in any form. It’s the balance it maintains to serve the purpose and keeps the nations calm and peaceful. If we go deep into particular thing as of art! It is the form of expression which in turn holds the history which is useful for our future generation. Spending money on such historical valued forms may not lead to any disproportions or misunderstanding. They may be only reliable things which our future generations should rely on, as they definitely don’t have idea about classical arts or liberal arts which already our generation is lacking knowledge about. Utilising some bucks on such things may never be waste. For example government of Britain has completely allocated more than 70% of funds only for using them on arts and classical and liberal arts.
Urging for aesthetic embellishments may be pleasing at times like in the very first beginning whether it could be for states or homes in it.
Government should decide how to spend the funds and make a lot of small amounts and at the same time it should satisfy needs of citizens its handling.
To conclude, arts are the things which need protection and promotions it should never be neglected. Other things can be paid attention to a certain threshold. However balancing between both needs to be maintained. In my opinion, arts needs special attention.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 41, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...Urging for aesthetic embellishments may be pleasing at times like in the very first beginni...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 160, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
... paid attention to a certain threshold. However balancing between both needs to be main...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, may, so, well, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89932885906 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78231430928 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 176.041082164 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56711409396 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8753907621 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.285714286 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2857142857 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 7.06120827912 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129827501151 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0454335308498 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486280962276 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0781916277138 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0599168067691 0.056905535591 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.33 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.