Some people think governments should focus on reducing environmental pollution and housing problems to help people prevent illness and disease. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is indubitable that people’s health depends on environmental and housing problems. Some of the people are in the opinion that the government should take care of this problem. I, however, disagree with this notion. I believe that even though the government should address environmental pollution and housing scarcity, there are many other things in which the government should spend to prevent ill health.
Indeed, environmental pollution and housing problems are the two main source of illness and disease. For instance, a country like India, there are a lot of people who live in slums due to overpopulation. In such a scenario there is a rapid chance of spread of contagious diseases such as common flu and other deadly viruses. Moreover, they are deprived of clean water and air because of pollution. So, if the government provide basic housing and take care of environmental pollution, such issues can be avoided to an extent.
However, simply having an overlook into the environmental and housing issues would not solve the problem. The government should spend its budget on health facilities and clinics such that everyone has the access to basic health care. Even they can support by providing free medicine or immunization for a preventable disease like polio, measles and many others. All over the world, governments are providing free pulse polio vaccine to eradicate this disease. Furthermore, in this current era cancer is one of the common diseases, it will be cheaper if treated at the earlier stage, so the government can introduce a scheme to have a screen test during medical check-ups.
Additionally, awareness among the people is imperative, it is the onus of the government to have mass awareness campaigns to let people know about the things which they need to do and not. To exemplify, even if the government provide housing to all, but the people keep stagnant water in coolers and other areas, dengue can spread like an epidemic and all government efforts will go in vain.
To recapitulate, simply giving priority to environmental pollution and housing will not prevent all disease. The government should allocate funds to other things such as basic health and awareness of the people also to prevent disease.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 87, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: Some
... on environmental and housing problems. Some of the people are in the opinion that the gove...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, moreover, so, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1879.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13387978142 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8220657968 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502732240437 0.561755894193 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 589.5 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3985437848 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.388888889 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328274166288 0.244688304435 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108882591233 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763935209807 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206043645421 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0866081113731 0.056905535591 152% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.