Some people think that a hundred years later the world will progress and life will be easier for the majority of people, while others disagree.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Although the technological and scientific progressions are adding comfortability to the living standards of people, these are not always guaranteed. Many believe that the world's development will be the reason of smooth life while a few disagree with this view. I will present both views in this essay and my support for the former opinion.
The proponents of the latter view state that the ongoing advancement will not solve the problem of the upcoming century and living a peaceful life would be harder. For instance, the world's population itself will be double and growing trends of global warming will intensify. As a result, the greater need to feed the enormous population, their healthcare, education, and accommodation needs will increase. Whereas, the average cultivation areas, natural resources and water resources are shrinking. Furthermore, more and more nations are equipping themselves with atomic arsenals which can threaten the existence of human race, in the case of unresolved conflicts.
On the other hand, the progression in various fields of life improving the prospects of better living in a few decades. The looming feeding crises are being resolved through multiple harvests in a given time period and developed nations are preparing to cope with the rapidly increasing demands of food. Consequently, the technological advance nation Israel is preparing to feed the world from their innovative cultivation methods. There is a widespread campaign run by various NGO's about global warming and promoting the responsible living by planting more trees. In addition to these many nations are signing non-nuclear proliferation agreements in order to promote peace.
To sum up, I firmly believe that life would be much easier as the world progress. Just as our living standards are far better than our ancestors, our descendants will have an easy life comparatively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 172, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...lways guaranteed. Many believe that the worlds development will be the reason of smoot...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...life would be harder. For instance, the worlds population itself will be double and gr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, if, so, whereas, while, for instance, in addition, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1576.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37883959044 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90083516752 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60409556314 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.6495081466 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.066666667 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5333333333 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252628685262 0.244688304435 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809922622575 0.084324248473 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.079124962913 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158880628167 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0828107918571 0.056905535591 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.