The environment in which a child grows up plays an important role in shaping the young one’s future. Although it is considered by some to be advantageous for children who grow up in cities, other people believe that childhood in the countryside is more beneficial. Children raising in cities can gain in terms of education and access to health care but compromise on some fronts. On the other hand, the countryside lags behind in a few aspects but offers cheerful upbringing.
Firstly, one benefit children get in cities is better school education. As mostly best of the institutes are located in urban areas, as students children get plenty of them to choose to study. Also, people from various backgrounds migrate to cities providing valuable exposure to children with a great understanding of various cultures. As a result, they grow up as tolerant and adjusting adults. Another benefit of living in cities is the availability of better health care facilities. Especially during the early years, children are vaccinated to immune them from life taking diseases and are required to visit paediatrics more often that can be easily available in city hospitals. However, a life in the cities is more hectic. Due to that children may not get enough of their parents’ time in childhood days.
On the other hand, the countryside provides with a clearer atmosphere as compared to cities because various pollution levels are significantly less in non-urban areas. This certainly provides a suitable environment for children to get nurtured. Additionally, rural areas have open fields, forests and natural beauties which makes childhood more memorable. Therefore, once children grow up they have many stories to tell about childhood experiences. But children brought up in rural areas may find little difficult to adapt to city life when they move there in future for job or work, mainly due to cultural shock.
To conclude, life in cities give opportunities to children which they may not get in countrysides. At the same time, children raised in rural area are not completely at losing side.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rea are not completely at losing side.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, so, therefore, as to, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1769.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18768328446 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86307434877 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554252199413 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.4602784254 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1052631579 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9473684211 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.10526315789 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240815210081 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0772032358718 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639699821416 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153136442921 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0697397503296 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.