Some people think it’s better to choose friends who always have the same opinions as them. Other people believe it’s good to have friends who sometimes disagree with them.
Dicuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Since we are human and now living in a society that emphasizes connectivity. We all need various relationships such as families, colleagues, and friends. Especially, we always have our criteria when making friends. Some people argue that friends are must regularly have a common perspective as them. However, others suppose friendship should be built up by people with several distinct standpoints.
To erase distances, friends should indeed have equal characters or behaviors alike. Therefore, they able to share their hobbies, their points of view and shorten their gaps. Thus, they could easily understand each other. For instant, if you and your friends support a similar football team, you will feel more interested to discuss with them about the team’s issues or the rivals of the team in a comfortable manner.
On the other hand, identical angles are not always compulsory showed by our friends. Every person has their private sides and choices. Nonetheless, it does not mean they could not be friends together. Occasionally, if they have unlikely observations, they could help to discover an effective way to solve problems and learn from each other to improve their skills or supply their knowledge at the same time. In parallel, a true friendship is not only sharing the same values but also creating a new emotion base on differences and comprehension.
In conclusion, I somewhat agree that we should have a few differences to lift and help in our complementary roles. Besides that, to enhance a stable friendship, we also need to choose someone who has a resemblance to us.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 393, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a comfortable manner" with adverb for "comfortable"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...team’s issues or the rivals of the team in a comfortable manner. On the other hand, identical angle...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, nonetheless, so, therefore, thus, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1340.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17374517375 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87129958286 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656370656371 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 402.3 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1351702528 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.75 106.682146367 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1875 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217516078915 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0633766426216 0.084324248473 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065859467944 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120407137456 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0447942559541 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.41 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 78.4519038076 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 9.78957915832 51% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.