Some people think that rich countries should support poor countries in terms of aid for health care and education.
To what extent do you agree?
A considerable number of people assert developed countries must help impoverished countries in the form of a medical unit and educational institutions. Others, on the other hand, are adamant opponents claiming that it is not mandatory. As far as I am concerned, there are a plethora of cogent and compelling arguments to buttress the former, thereby I predisposed to gainsay the latter.
To begin with, there are myriads of advantages for wealthy countries to support economically backward in the medical unit.
Firstly, there are an inadequate amount of medical facilities in poor countries. Specifically, due to poor sanitation, more unknown diseases were widespread around the nation. Moreover, there are no extended facilities available in those countries. To fix this, for instance, a medical campaign can be organised by developed countries to support poor people. Finally, this will enhance their quality of life.
Secondly, it is highly noticeable that there are some merits to support in educational aspects. The standard of education in low-income countries are below average while comparing with the highly developed nations. Because the teachers were less paid and due to insufficient fund the schools and colleges were not maintained properly. For example, as per the recent survey, nearly 120 government schools were abandoned this year owing to improper maintenance. Certainly, it can be fixed by providing the school supplements like computers, laptops, and stationery items will involve several children to attend the school regularly.
All in all, it is highly recommended that developed countries can improve the standard of living in a poor country by helping in providing better healthcare centres and educational amenities.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'amounts'?
Suggestion: amounts
...nit. Firstly, there are an inadequate amount of medical facilities in poor countries...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, for instance, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1499.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 267.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61423220974 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03697054867 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59925093633 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.2448952505 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.9333333333 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174097169799 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544886319333 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0592917247768 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105305773983 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268129028346 0.056905535591 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.