Some people think that a sense of competition in children should be encouraged. Others believe that children who are taught to co-operate rather than compete become more useful adults.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
It is often argued that teaching kids to have a co-operative approach makes them more beneficial adults. On the other hand, others believe that a sense of challenge should be supported in children. This essay will argue that although a sense of competition often results in a strong personality of children, I believe that teaching children to be cooperative helps in improving their social contribution when they become adults.
Building a strong personality in their children is the motive for the advocates of teaching competitive approach to them. This is because, if the kids are not taught the sense of competition, they will often have difficulties in solving the problems they might face in the future, such as subjects they should study, solving a problem that might face them in their jobs. Educating the kids' challenges skills will help them to think out of the box and find solutions for the obstacles and make the right decisions in the future.
Despite this argument, other people feel that educating children's sense of cooperation will result in useful adults as their social contribution will improve. That is to say that the more children learn the assistance aspects in their younger age and the approach of teamwork, such as community services, participating in campaigns, the more it will be built in their behavior; Consequently, they will be ready to help in improving their community as well as their society.
In conclusion, while a strong personality of their children is the reason for some people to support the teaching of a competitive approach to them, I firmly believe that a sense of co-operation is better to be taught to children to increase their social contribution in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10915492958 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86777130875 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 176.041082164 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.450704225352 0.561755894193 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.2975951904 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.5522495658 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.222222222 106.682146367 151% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.5555555556 20.7667163134 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.1111111111 7.06120827912 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254838458554 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.134302360127 0.084324248473 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0863606209303 0.0667982634062 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189540416346 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0938145009748 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 13.0946893788 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.95 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.1190380762 142% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.