Some people think that teenagers should follow the example of older people. Others think that it is natural for teenagers to challenge what older people say.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In the present generation, it is not an uncommon fact that youngsters often disagree with the views of older generation. While the expertice of the elders definitely holds value, vast developments in areas such as technology, medicine, and science rendered the young world more knowledge and information than elders.
The world has truly evolved and we are enjoying the ripen fruits of our ancestors. In other words, the research and study by the older generation have paved path for numerous advancements what the current generation is utilising. Lot of the theories date back to several hundred centuries. For example electricity, telephone or aeroplane , all these have been invented based on the epitome of ancient concepts. So, it undeniable that aging population across the globe have immense knowledge to be passed on to their descendents and following their advice can be beneficial.
On the flip side, internet has provided access to all sorts of information to nook and cranny of the world. Due to this, teenagers often search or investigate answers for most of their questions over the web rather than asking their elders. In some cases, it is often true that even old people would not have complete information on a subject and it is quite impossible to answer all questions in all areas of life. Hence, youngsters do not approach the elder's path. Rather than following the examples set by their elders, they try to think out of the box. Because of this innovative and thriving mindset, millennials constantly keep themselves diving into an area on which they do not have whole lot of idea.
However, I believe the right approach would be not completely neglecting the elder's footsteps but a combination of their expertice with current progress. Evolution is the key to survival. If we would have been gratified with our grandparents view and thoughts, humans would not thrive to achieve all what is possible today. Imagine, if aeroplane was only on paper and Wright brothers would not have challenged the world.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 49, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...d has truly evolved and we are enjoying the ripen fruits of our ancestors. In other words...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 338, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...mple electricity, telephone or aeroplane , all these have been invented based on t...
^^
Line 9, column 455, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'elders'' or 'elder's'?
Suggestion: elders'; elder's
.... Hence, youngsters do not approach the elders path. Rather than following the example...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 692, Rule ID: WHOLE_LOT[1]
Message: Use simply 'lot'.
Suggestion: lot
... into an area on which they do not have whole lot of idea. However, I believe the r...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 195, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...Evolution is the key to survival. If we would have been gratified with our grandparents view an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, so, while, for example, such as, in other words, in some cases
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10479041916 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74790022916 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589820359281 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8788044615 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.294117647 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11764705882 7.06120827912 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124857566469 0.244688304435 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333061640111 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0393130444479 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.065383353431 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0251842631105 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.