Some people think that watching sports in one's free time is just a waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?
Spending a considerable amount of the time watching competitive games is perceived to be unproductive by some individuals. I firmly oppose the given notion as sports not only provides an excellent source of entertainment but also ameliorates the social skills of an individual, provided the same is not done excessively
Two initiate, the proponents of the idea argue that watching sports for a much longer time can degenerate the cognitive skills of its viewers. Owing to the fact that fans are passionate about their favourite sports games and watch every live telecast of it despite being telecast for longer hours. Consequently, this desperation affects their mental health in the long run. For instance, a football admirer became extremely dull and lazy when his favourite team could not win a match as reported in the Tribune newspaper in 2017.
Contrarily, where such problems do occur, the majority of individuals spend their time with family while watching sports shows as a part of their amusement activity. This trend promotes increasing relationship building among people. To illustrate, ever since the Indian Premier league has started in India, its inhabitants gather at their friends or relatives places to take pleasure in watching the preferred games on Television channels together which boasts their interpersonal skills.
In conclusion, although there are a few drawbacks of watching sports when done excessively, the significant benefits that amuse people while uniting them in their spare time should not be forsaken.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, so, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1312.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 241.0 315.596192385 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44398340249 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89987766529 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.680497925311 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 409.5 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 16.0721442886 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.7780797096 49.4020404114 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.777777778 106.682146367 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7777777778 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.44444444444 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172089797823 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673428825172 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637820565139 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105601505546 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0192127677306 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.78957915832 204% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.