Some people want the government to spend more money for looking life on other planets; however, others think it a waste of public money when there are so many problems on Earth that the government should be solving. Discuss both views and give your opinion
The space travel and exploration have attracted human beings since the beginning of times. Some people prefer the government to allocate more funds to foster detection of extraterrestrial life, while others claim that the authorities should focus on the problems that exist on this planet. I strongly believe that the space exploration is essential step for humanity.
On the one hand, I am of the opinion that the humanity has to endeavor to find planets which can be habitable. This means that our own home, the Earth, will sooner or later become unfit for life. Proceeding from this, scientists with the aid of the government should do their best to both discover new worlds and transfer life to these new livable planets. In other words, in order to survive as species humans must leave the Earth in the distant future.
On the other hand, several problems on Earth require a special attention from the governments. Firstly, a large number of people still starve in different part of the world. Therefore, financial support has to be provided to these regions in order to curb the famine. Moreover, the issue of overpopulation must be tackled by the authorities. This is because with an increase in number of human beings the number of resources deplete; hence it will be impossible to feed everyone in the long run. Thus, solving the world’s problems can be exorbitantly expensive and necessary funds should be spent with care.
To conclude, I personally consider space exploration as a boon for the society which will benefit the human kind in the future. Nevertheless, many people sensibly argue that many problems on our planet also require funds to be resolved.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ttention from the governments. Firstly, a large number of people still starve in different part o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, therefore, thus, while, as to, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1404.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.01428571429 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70821689964 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578571428571 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3174720644 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250443202044 0.244688304435 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0759207229017 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058782867072 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151082570757 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306360293303 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.