Some people work for the same organization all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organizations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Working with a single firm for entire life is debatable. From the past several years, the trend has changed to various opinion. A certain segment of society opine that some people work for the same company throughout their life, while others believe in switching the job. I will discuss both the views and share my opinion.
To begin with, there are groups of people who dedicate their professional life to a single organization. The reason being working with a same organization gives you multiple benefits such as financial stability, flexibility in working hours, comfort level and many more. For example, as per the last research, more than 30% of the population in UK works with a same company. Because long-term employees of the UK companies can normally retire at the age of 55 and organization gives 75% of the salary until they die. However, having the same job for life does not suits to everyone and could force them to move on.
On the other hand, some people believe in altering the job. This is because they think that working with various companies gives new exposure, career growth and opportunity to learn new things. When a worker starts a new job, he gets involved with multiple projects and corporate culture. To exemplify, Business today magazine recently reports that average Google employee work there for 4 years and the average of Microsoft is less than 3 years. In addition, sometimes workers get bullied and harassed by their co-worker, so they prefer to switch the job.
To sum up, after analyzing both the views, people should work with the same firm for their entire life, since it is secured and gives financial stability and comfort level.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 565, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'suit'
Suggestion: suit
..., having the same job for life does not suits to everyone and could force them to mov...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, for example, in addition, such as, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1403.0 1615.20841683 87% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94014084507 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46859615386 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609154929577 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.957184475 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5333333333 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.402823860039 0.244688304435 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131332455159 0.084324248473 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878022663817 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267934239692 0.151304729494 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0848390031537 0.056905535591 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.