Some say that rich countries should help poor countries with food and education.Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your own experience.
Some experts consider that it would be beneficial if prosperous nations assist impoverished lands by supply of quality food and education system. From my perspective, I completely agree with this notion owing to certain reasons I have, which are narrated further in preceeding paragraphs.
Admittedly, there are several resons for individuals concluding for wealthy kingdoms to support destitude realms. An evident reason is advancement in alleviation of malnutrition in the citizens. Providing help to such struggling nations in tems of eating material will enhance the health conditon of such people and would ensure from severe diseases like anemia and other blood related diseases. Moreover, another probable reason to be considered is eradication of poverty level.Assisting the undeveloped country with efficient education study material can create an educated society with intellectual people. These humans, consequently, can support themselves with money by working in various sectors.
Furthermore, progression in peace is also a notable ground enforcing affluent territories to provide nations with eatable materials and learing system. Rich countries provide financial support for food items to poor natiosn, therefore, the political parties of both counties come close each other. These leads to advancement in the peace level of both counties. In addition, it would not be unlikely if development in economic condition has been considered. Once a wealth country like America allots effective education in terms of quality teachers for training to Indian schools, a tremendous development in the field of education would be notated. As a result, the prosperity of such educated counties could to infinite.
In Conclusion, I strongly advocate with the group of people saying that nations with huge prosperity ought to help destitude countries pertaining to better health and removal of poverty along with peace and economic development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ition in the citizens. Providing help to such struggling nations in tems of eati...
^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oviding help to such struggling nations in tems of eating material will enhance ...
^^
Line 5, column 482, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Assisting
...sidered is eradication of poverty level.Assisting the undeveloped country with efficient ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 695, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... result, the prosperity of such educated counties could to infinite. In Conc...
^^
Line 13, column 26, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...infinite. In Conclusion, I strongly advocate with the group of people saying...
^^
Line 13, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of poverty along with peace and economic development.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1675.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.77586206897 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99683542961 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.624137931034 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8342131732 49.4020404114 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.642857143 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7142857143 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.21428571429 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182950864801 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054730655091 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464133732343 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114651005147 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0138298723291 0.056905535591 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.