Some young people look forward to a year of travelling, a gap year, before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons. For others, this is an expensive waste of time.
It has been a trend that travelling to unknown countries as a break before looking forward to job opportunities or higher education helps a person be more focused towards his/her goals. But not everybody has the same opinion as some might contradict this thought as a waste of time and money. This essay will further enlighten the readers with both the views.
Travelling has shown its benefits in people’s life in plethora. some which could be such as meeting new people might open new pathways with respect to a person’s curriculum. Moreover, different cultures, lifestyles, as well as food habits inspire some people to adopt them in their day-to-day life. For example, it has been seen that many foreigners visiting India will surely take YOGA as a part of their daily routine which shall give them health and concentration. Many a time it has been observed that travelling induces creativity and focus in a human’s life. For instance, a recent survey in the United States about university admissions has reported that people seeking admissions after a gap secure higher ranked institution in comparison to those who do not take a gap. Further, a report on working professionals has shown that people who take short or long trips during a year show more efficiency in work in comparison to those who didn't.
However, due to increased competition, taking a break from studies could lead to missing out on opportunities to get into elite institutions. Each passing year cutoff to get into top tier institutions keeps increasing. Further, it might distract them from their goals rather, they could just finish their studies, secure highly paid jobs and then save some money to travel for relaxation. In addition, certain countries do not support this kind of thoughts of taking a break from studies for a year or so. In countries like India, China etc. parents cannot bare such costs, rather children must start contributing towards family income as soon as they finish their studies.
To conclude, travelling is beneficial because it helps in enhancing an individual’s credibility in terms of personality development and learning new skills in his/her life but it comes with a price which is not an option chosen by all.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[7]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'to jobbing'.
Suggestion: to jobbing
...tries as a break before looking forward to job opportunities or higher education helps...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...fits in people's life in plethora. some which could be such as meeting new peop...
^^^^
Line 3, column 959, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...ency in work in comparison to those who didnt. However, due to increased competiti...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 543, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Parents
...so. In countries like India, China etc. parents cannot bare such costs, rather children...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, moreover, so, then, well, for example, for instance, in addition, kind of, such as, as well as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1884.0 1615.20841683 117% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09189189189 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86399782902 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589189189189 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.4002967735 49.4020404114 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.823529412 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7647058824 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.94117647059 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218566454315 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600094784194 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0376205764198 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112003811218 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0446712623042 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 50.2224549098 117% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.